mL to Cups Converter

Convert mL to cups using the cup standard that matches your recipe.

Convert 5 cup standards Bidirectional
Rate this calculator · 4.7 (3)

Milliliters ↔ Cups

5 cup standards · NIST + FDA references · bidirectional

Instructions — mL to Cups Converter

1

Pick the cup standard

A "cup" is not the same volume everywhere. The default is the US customary cup (236.59 mL), used in most American recipes. Switch to metric (250 mL) for Australian, New Zealand, and modern European recipes; to imperial (284 mL) for older British recipes; to US legal (240 mL) for FDA nutrition labels; or to the Japanese cup (200 mL) for Japanese cooking.

2

Enter mL or cups

Type into either field and the other updates instantly. Quick picks cover the most-searched volumes: 60, 120, 240, 250, 500, 750, 1000, and 2000 mL - covering everything from cocktail jiggers to 2-liter bottles.

3

Adjust precision

Two decimals is enough for almost any cooking. Set to 0 for casual conversions, raise to 4 for pharmaceutical or scientific work. The reverse calculation (cups to mL) at 2 decimal places is precise enough that the rounding error is smaller than the difference between cup standards.

Quick rule: 1 US cup ≈ 237 mL. 500 mL ≈ 2.11 US cups or exactly 2 metric cups. The metric cup is mathematically convenient: 1000 mL = 4 metric cups.
FDA cup: the cup printed on US nutrition facts panels is 240 mL, defined in 21 CFR 101.12. It is 1.4% larger than the recipe-traditional US cup of 236.59 mL.

Formulas

The mL-to-cups conversion is one division by the cup volume. The catch is choosing the right cup, because "1 cup" means five different volumes depending on the country and use.

Milliliters to cups
$$ C = \frac{V_{mL}}{V_{cup}} $$
Cups equals millilitres divided by the chosen cup volume in mL. 500 mL divided by 236.59 (US) gives 2.11 cups; divided by 250 (metric) gives 2.00 cups.
Cups to milliliters
$$ V_{mL} = C \times V_{cup} $$
Millilitres equals cups times cup volume. 1.5 US cups = 354.88 mL. 1.5 metric cups = 375 mL.
US customary cup
$$ 1\,\text{US cup} = 236.5882365\,\text{mL} $$
Defined as exactly 8 US customary fluid ounces. The US fluid ounce is 1/128 of a US gallon, which is 231 cubic inches by US law since 1832.
US legal cup (FDA)
$$ 1\,\text{US legal cup} = 240\,\text{mL} $$
Defined in 21 CFR 101.12 for nutrition labelling. The 240 mL value is a deliberate rounding for label readability. 1.4% larger than the recipe cup.
Metric cup
$$ 1\,\text{metric cup} = 250\,\text{mL} $$
Used in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and most modern European recipes. Designed to fit cleanly into the SI: 1 L = 4 metric cups.
US vs metric cup ratio
$$ C_{metric} = C_{US} \times \frac{236.59}{250} \approx C_{US} \times 0.946 $$
A US cup is 5.4% smaller than a metric cup. 4 US cups = 946 mL; 4 metric cups = 1000 mL. The gap compounds across larger recipes.

Reference

mL to cups across all standards
mLUS cust. (236.59)US legal (240)Metric (250)Imperial (284)Common label
600.250.250.240.21¼ US cup
800.340.330.320.28⅓ US cup
1200.510.500.480.42½ US cup
1800.760.750.720.63¾ US cup
2000.850.830.800.701 Japanese cup
2371.000.990.950.831 US cup
2401.011.000.960.841 FDA cup
2501.061.041.000.881 metric cup
2841.201.181.141.001 imperial cup
5002.112.082.001.762 metric cups
7503.173.133.002.643 metric cups
10004.234.174.003.521 liter
20008.458.338.007.042 liters

Cup standards around the world

Five definitions of "1 cup" are in active use. The difference between the smallest (Japanese, 200 mL) and the largest (imperial, 284 mL) is 42%.

Cup definitions
StandardmLUse
Japanese200.0Japanese cooking, rice cookers
US customary236.59US recipes (default)
US legal / FDA240.0US nutrition labels
Metric250.0AU, NZ, CA, modern EU
Imperial (UK)284.13Older British recipes
US cup history
YearEvent
1707Queen Anne wine gallon fixed at 231 in³
1832US Treasury formally adopts 231 in³ gallon
1896Fannie Farmer cookbook standardises level cup
1971FDA adopts 240 mL cup for nutrition labels
1993Nutrition Labeling and Education Act formalises 240 mL

Note: cooking-conversion charts from NIST and the USDA use the US customary cup (236.59 mL) for recipes, but the FDA Nutrition Facts panel uses the 240 mL legal cup. Both are correct in their respective contexts.

Article — mL to Cups Converter

mL to cups: the five definitions of "1 cup" and how to tell which one you need

A US customary cup is 236.59 millilitres. The US legal cup, used on FDA nutrition labels, is 240 mL. The metric cup, standard in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and modern European recipes, is 250 mL. The British imperial cup is 284 mL. The Japanese cup is 200 mL. Same word, five different volumes - a 42% spread from smallest to largest. The calculator above runs the conversion in both directions for all five.

For most American recipes, leave the dropdown on US customary and the result will match what cookbook authors expect. For Australian, New Zealand, or modern European recipes, switch to the metric cup (250 mL) - the math is cleaner because 1 litre is exactly 4 metric cups.

How many millilitres are in a cup?

The answer depends entirely on which cup the recipe is referencing. The same number on the side of a coffee mug can mean four different things depending on where the mug was manufactured and which authority set the standard.

  • Japanese cup = 200 mL (traditional sho rice scale)
  • US customary cup = 236.59 mL (US recipes, the default for most American cookbooks)
  • US legal cup = 240 mL (FDA nutrition labels, 21 CFR 101.12)
  • Metric cup = 250 mL (Australia, New Zealand, Canada, modern Europe)
  • Imperial UK cup = 284 mL (older British recipes pre-1971)

NIST's Metric Kitchen reference and the USDA's measurement conversion tables both use the US customary cup (236.59 mL) when converting between mL and cups for recipes. The FDA's Nutrition Facts panel uses the 240 mL legal cup. Both are correct in their own contexts, which is what makes the whole topic confusing in the first place.

The five cup standards in use today

Each of the five values has a documented origin. None of them is wrong - they are just different. Modern recipes and food regulations specify which they mean. Older recipes often do not, which is the most common source of conversion errors in kitchens.

Japanese
200 mL
Sho rice scale
US customary
236.59 mL
US recipes
US legal (FDA)
240 mL
Nutrition labels
Metric
250 mL
AU, NZ, modern EU
Imperial
284 mL
Older UK

US customary versus metric - the 5.4% gap

The US customary cup of 236.59 mL is what's used in cookbooks published in the United States. The metric cup of 250 mL is what's used almost everywhere else in the English-speaking world, plus most of Europe. The two values differ by 13.41 mL, or 5.4%. For a single cup that is barely noticeable; for a recipe calling for four or five cups it adds up to a meaningful difference.

Did you know

The metric cup was created on purpose to integrate with the SI. 1 millilitre is the volume of 1 cubic centimetre of water at 4°C, which weighs 1 gram. With the cup defined as exactly 250 mL, a cup of water weighs exactly 250 grams. The cleanness of the math is why Australia and New Zealand adopted the metric cup officially in the 1970s, when both countries went metric. The US customary cup has no such clean relationship - it traces back to inches.

4 US cups equals 946.35 mL. 4 metric cups equals exactly 1000 mL - 1 litre. That difference of 53.65 mL across a four-cup recipe is enough to change the texture of bread dough, the doneness of custards, and the boiling time of soups. Professional translators of cookbooks routinely re-test recipes when converting between US and metric editions for this reason.

In 1973 the FDA needed a standardised cup for nutrition labelling. The US customary cup (236.59 mL) was the obvious choice, but the value is awkward to print on a label. The FDA chose to round it up to 240 mL - a cleaner number, mathematically convenient because it gives exactly 8 servings of 30 mL per cup. The rounded value was formalised in 21 CFR 101.12 ("Reference Amounts Customarily Consumed") and remains the legal definition for US nutrition labelling under the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990.

Label cup vs recipe cup

The 240 mL value printed on US Nutrition Facts panels is not the same as the 236.59 mL used in American recipes. The 1.4% difference is small enough to ignore in everyday cooking but matters in technical work: pharmaceutical dosing, infant formula preparation, and food-science research all need to specify which cup is in use. Always check which standard a source is using before you trust the number.

Common 100, 250, 500 and 1000 mL conversions

The most-searched volumes and their cup equivalents across the four major standards:

mL to cups - common volumes
100 mL 0.42 US / 0.40 metric
200 mL 0.85 US / 0.80 metric / 1.00 Japanese
237 mL 1.00 US / 0.95 metric
250 mL 1.06 US / 1.00 metric
355 mL (can of soda) 1.50 US / 1.42 metric
500 mL 2.11 US / 2.00 metric
750 mL (wine bottle) 3.17 US / 3.00 metric
1000 mL (1 L) 4.23 US / 4.00 metric

The 1832 US Treasury decision that fixed the cup

The US customary cup is a chain of inherited definitions going back to 18th-century England. In 1707, Queen Anne signed legislation fixing the British wine gallon at exactly 231 cubic inches - a value already in customary use among London wine merchants. When the United States gained independence, the new country kept the wine gallon as its standard.

In 1832, the US Department of the Treasury formally restated the gallon at 231 cubic inches for federal use. Britain, in 1824, had moved on to a new imperial gallon of 277.42 cubic inches - which is why US and UK gallons (and therefore cups, pints, and quarts) are different sizes to this day. The US cup, at 1/16 of the US gallon, settled at 14.4375 cubic inches, which converts to 236.5882365 mL. That awkward fractional value is the price the US pays for keeping a definition that predates the metric system by almost a century.

Cooking, baking, and when to switch to grams

For soups, stews, sauces, and one-pot dishes, the difference between cup standards rarely matters - the recipe is forgiving enough that 240 mL versus 250 mL changes nothing. For baking, the gap matters: a bread recipe that needs 60% hydration by weight is sensitive to the exact mL of water added per gram of flour. Professional bakeries do not use cups at all; they weigh everything in grams.

Tip

For baking recipes worth getting right, switch to weight. A kitchen scale costs $15 to $40 and removes the cup question completely. King Arthur Baking, America Test Kitchen, and most modern professional cookbook authors now publish recipes in grams primarily, with cup measurements as a fallback. The scale eliminates the variability that no amount of careful measuring with cups can.

Which cup does your country use?

If you are following an American recipe, leave the calculator on US customary (236.59 mL). If you are following an Australian, New Zealand, or Canadian recipe, switch to metric (250 mL). For older British recipes - generally anything published before the UK metric transition of the 1970s - use the imperial cup (284 mL). For Japanese cooking, especially traditional rice recipes, use the Japanese cup (200 mL). For anything found on a Nutrition Facts panel, use the FDA legal cup (240 mL). The five definitions cover almost every recipe context you will encounter.

FAQ

It depends on the cup standard. The US customary cup is 236.59 mL (used in most American recipes). The US legal cup on FDA nutrition labels is 240 mL. The metric cup, standard in Australia, New Zealand, and most of Europe, is 250 mL. The imperial UK cup is 284 mL. The Japanese cup is 200 mL.
500 mL = 2.11 US customary cups, or exactly 2.00 metric cups. The metric calculation is the cleanest: 250 mL per cup means 1 litre is 4 metric cups and 500 mL is 2. The US conversion produces awkward decimals because the US cup is based on inches, not the metric system.
250 mL = 1.06 US customary cups, or exactly 1.00 metric cup. If a recipe calls for “1 cup” and is from Australia, New Zealand, Canada, or modern Europe, 250 mL is what you want. If it is from the US, use 237 mL.
13.4 mL, or 5.4%. The US customary cup is 236.59 mL; the metric cup is 250 mL. 4 US cups make 946 mL; 4 metric cups make exactly 1 litre. For occasional cooking the difference is small; for baking, where ratios matter, it can change the result.
Almost. The FDA defines 240 mL as the “1 cup” for nutrition labelling under 21 CFR 101.12 - a deliberate rounding of the US customary cup (236.59 mL) for label readability. For nutrition labels, yes - 1 cup = 240 mL. For recipes, no - 1 US cup = 236.59 mL. The difference is 1.4%.
100 mL is 0.42 US customary cups (just under half a cup), or 0.40 metric cups (two-fifths). In Imperial UK cups it is 0.35 cups. None of the values map cleanly because 100 mL is the metric round number, not the cup round number.
Historical accident. The US cup descends from the British wine gallon (231 cubic inches), fixed by Queen Anne in 1707 and formally adopted by the US Treasury in 1832. The metric cup was created later as a round-number SI equivalent. The imperial UK cup is based on the Imperial gallon, which was different from the wine gallon. The Japanese 200 mL cup matches the traditional sho rice-measure scale. No central authority ever standardised across countries.
Multiply US cups by 236.59 to get mL. For most recipes the simpler rule is: multiply by 240 to get a clean estimate, accepting a 1.4% error. To convert from a metric-cup recipe to a US-cup kitchen, divide metric cups by 0.946. Or measure by weight in grams - it eliminates the cup question entirely.