One Rep Max Calculator (1RM)

Estimate your one rep max (1RM) from a submaximal set.

Health Epley + Brzycki 50-95% rep table
Rate this calculator · 4.0 (1)

One Rep Max (1RM)

Epley + Brzycki, lb or kg, percent-1RM table

Instructions — One Rep Max Calculator (1RM)

1

Pick your unit

Pounds (lb) or kilograms (kg). The formulas are unit-agnostic - the math works on any consistent weight unit. Default is pounds because most US strength data is reported in lb. Flip to kg for IPF/IWF comparisons and SI-unit research.

2

Enter weight and reps to failure

"Reps to failure" means the most reps you can complete with that weight before form breaks. For accurate 1RM estimation, stay in the 2-10 rep range. Above 10 reps the formulas drift; above 20 they break down completely. Use a recent set, not a number from years ago.

3

Read both estimates

Epley and Brzycki give slightly different numbers. Epley tends to overestimate above 10 reps; Brzycki tends to be more conservative. The average is a sensible working number for programming. The training-percentage table maps the estimated 1RM to common rep ranges.

Use sets of 3-8 for best accuracy. The Reynolds 2006 study compared formula estimates to true 1RM and found errors below 5% in the 2-10 rep range. Outside that band, treat the number as approximate.
The math is exercise-agnostic. The same Epley and Brzycki formulas apply to squat, bench, deadlift, overhead press, bent-over row, and any other compound lift. Strength standards differ by lift, but the rep-to-1RM relationship is similar across exercises.

Formulas

Two formulas dominate the strength-training literature. Both convert a submaximal set (weight w and reps r) into a 1RM estimate. The calculator runs both and reports their average.

Epley (1985)
$$ 1RM = w \times \left(1 + \frac{r}{30}\right) $$
Weight times one plus reps divided by 30. Boyd Epley at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln developed it on college football players. Most accurate at 1-10 reps; overestimates above 10.
Brzycki (1993)
$$ 1RM = w \times \frac{36}{37 - r} $$
Matt Brzycki, JOPERD 1993. Slightly more conservative than Epley at low reps and slightly more aggressive at high reps. Diverges at 37 reps (division by zero).
Average estimate
$$ 1RM_{avg} = \frac{1RM_{Epley} + 1RM_{Brzycki}}{2} $$
The midpoint between Epley and Brzycki is generally within ±3% of true 1RM for sets of 3-8 reps. Use this number for program planning.
Training weights from 1RM
$$ W_r = 1RM \times p_r $$
Once 1RM is set, training weights at any percentage are a simple product. 5 reps at 87%, 8 reps at 81%, 10 reps at 75% are standard programming numbers.
Lombardi (1989) alternative
$$ 1RM = w \times r^{0.10} $$
Power-curve formula, less common. Tracks Epley closely at 1-5 reps but flattens at high reps. Useful as a cross-check; the calculator shows Epley and Brzycki by default.
Wathan (1994) alternative
$$ 1RM = \frac{100w}{48.8 + 53.8 e^{-0.075r}} $$
Exponential-decay formula. Validated in the Whisenant 2003 JSCR paper as the most accurate of seven formulas in NCAA athletes. Use it as a second opinion for very experienced lifters.

Reference

Percent of 1RM at common rep counts
Reps% 1RMZone
1100%Testing
295%Max strength
393%Max strength
587%Strength
685%Strength
880%Hypertrophy
1075%Hypertrophy
1270%Hypertrophy
1565%Endurance

Accuracy by rep range

Epley accuracy
RepsError
1-2±2%
3-5±3%
6-10±5%
11-15±10%
16+±15%+
Brzycki accuracy
RepsError
1-2±2%
3-5±3%
6-10±4%
11-15±7%
16+±12%+

Article — One Rep Max Calculator (1RM)

One Rep Max Calculator

One rep max (1RM) is the most weight you can lift for a single full-range repetition. It is estimated from a submaximal set by two standard formulas: Epley (1985), 1RM = w × (1 + r/30), and Brzycki (1993), 1RM = w × 36/(37 − r). For 225 lb × 5 reps, Epley gives 262.5 lb and Brzycki 253.1 lb.

The calculator on this page runs both formulas, averages them, and prints a 50-95% training-weight table for every common percentage. Below are the details: where the formulas come from, when each is more accurate, and how to use the 1RM number in a real training plan.

What is one rep max?

One rep max is the maximum weight a lifter can move through the full range of a given exercise for a single repetition with correct form. It is the upper anchor of every strength-training program. Periodized programs are built around percentages of 1RM: 70-80% for hypertrophy blocks, 80-90% for strength blocks, 90-100% for peaking and testing.

Testing 1RM directly is the gold standard, but it is risky and tiring. A failed max attempt can pull a muscle, tweak a back, or cost a week of recovery. So most lifters estimate 1RM from a recent set of 2-10 reps using one of the formulas below. The estimate is accurate to ±3-5% for sets in that range, which is precise enough for programming.

The two main one rep max formulas

Boyd Epley, the longtime strength coach at the University of Nebraska, published his formula in 1985 as part of a training manual. It is the simpler of the two: 1RM = w × (1 + r/30). For 225 lb at 5 reps, that gives 225 × 1.1667 = 262.5 lb.

Matt Brzycki published his formula in the Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance in 1993. It uses a hyperbolic curve: 1RM = w × 36/(37 − r). For 225 lb at 5 reps, that gives 225 × 36/32 = 253.1 lb. Brzycki is more conservative at low reps and more aggressive at high reps. It diverges at 37 reps because the denominator hits zero.

Did you know

The LeSuer 1997 study in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research compared seven 1RM prediction formulas — Epley, Brzycki, Lander, Lombardi, Mayhew, O'Connor, and Wathan — across the squat, bench press, and deadlift in college athletes. Every formula was within 5% of true 1RM for 2-10 rep sets. None was decisively better.

Epley vs. Brzycki: which one rep max formula to use

For 1-5 reps, Epley and Brzycki agree within 1-2%. For 6-10 reps, they spread to 3-5 lb. Above 10 reps the gap widens, with Epley climbing faster. The Reynolds 2006 study in NCAA athletes found Brzycki slightly more accurate for lower-body lifts (squat, deadlift) and Epley slightly more accurate for upper-body lifts (bench, overhead press).

In practice, most coaches use the average of the two as the working 1RM. The calculator above reports both formulas plus the average. If you only want one number, use the average.

Quick 1RM estimates from 225 lb at r reps
r = 1 225 lb
r = 3 247 lb (Epley)
r = 5 263 lb / 253 lb
r = 8 285 lb / 279 lb
r = 10 300 lb / 300 lb
r = 12 315 lb / 324 lb

Using one rep max in programming

Once you have an estimated 1RM, the rest of the program follows. A hypertrophy block runs at 70-80% of 1RM for sets of 8-12. A strength block runs at 80-90% for sets of 3-6. A peak runs at 90-95% for sets of 1-3 in the lead-up to testing. The calculator's percent-1RM table maps the numbers directly.

The popular 5/3/1 program by Jim Wendler uses 90% of 1RM as the "training max" — the actual 1RM minus a buffer — and works waves of 65/75/85%, 70/80/90%, and 75/85/95%. The Texas Method uses similar percentages with weekly intensity ramps. Whichever program you follow, the 1RM number anchors the calculations.

Testing vs. estimating one rep max

Direct 1RM testing is rare in everyday training. A typical protocol warms up with 5 reps at 50%, 3 reps at 70%, 1 rep at 85%, 1 rep at 95%, then attempts 100% or higher. Rest is 3-5 minutes between top sets. A spotter or safety pins are mandatory on bench and squat.

Most lifters test 1RM every 8-12 weeks at most — at the end of a training cycle or before a meet. Between tests, the formulas in this calculator are the standard way to track strength progress without the recovery cost.

Tip

The most reliable way to estimate 1RM is to use a 3-5 rep set, where the last rep was a true grinding failure. Higher-rep sets introduce more form drift, more fatigue from accessory muscles, and more measurement noise. If you do "5 reps in reserve" sets, add 2-3 reps to your reported count before plugging into the formula.

One rep max standards by lift

Strength standards are exercise-specific. NSCA references for adult men: bench press 1.0× body weight is intermediate, 1.5× is advanced, 1.75× is elite. Squat is 1.5× / 2.0× / 2.5×. Deadlift is 1.75× / 2.5× / 2.75×. Overhead press is 0.55× / 0.85× / 1.1×. Women's values are about 65-75% of male values at the same body weight.

These standards drift with body-weight class. Lighter lifters tend to hit higher ratios because absolute strength scales sub-linearly with body mass. Federations use the Wilks or DOTS coefficient to compare lifters across weight classes; both are based on regression curves fit to thousands of meet performances.

Common mistakes with 1RM estimates

Reporting reps inaccurately is the biggest source of error. If you stop one rep short of failure, the formula underestimates your true 1RM. If you grind a sloppy final rep, the formula overestimates. Be honest about the last clean rep.

The second mistake is applying 1RM math to high-rep sets. A 20-rep set with light weight tests endurance, not strength, and the formulas drift badly. Stay in the 2-10 rep range for reliable estimates.

1RM estimates are not for novice lifters

If you have been lifting less than 3-6 months, your reported "rep max" is dominated by technique inconsistency, not by actual muscular failure. The formulas give numbers, but those numbers are not stable yet. Focus on linear progression (add 5 lb per session) instead of percentage-based programming until you can grind out true sets.

A one rep max cheat sheet

  • Epley = w × (1 + r/30)
  • Brzycki = w × 36 / (37 − r)
  • Best rep range = 2-10 reps for accuracy
  • Test frequency = every 8-12 weeks at most
  • Hypertrophy block = 70-80% × 8-12 reps
  • Strength block = 80-90% × 3-6 reps
  • Peak block = 90-95% × 1-3 reps
  • Brzycki limit = diverges at 37 reps

FAQ

Use the Epley formula: 1RM = w × (1 + r/30). For 225 lb × 5 reps, that gives 225 × (1 + 5/30) = 262.5 lb. The calculator also runs Brzycki and reports the average. For best accuracy, use a recent set of 2-10 reps where the last rep was a true failure or near-failure.
Both are within 5% of true 1RM for 2-10 rep sets. The LeSuer 1997 JSCR study compared seven formulas across squat, bench, and deadlift. Epley tends to overestimate at higher reps; Brzycki tends to be more conservative. For upper-body lifts Epley is often closer; for lower-body Brzycki tends to fit better. Either is fine for general programming.
Every 8-12 weeks at most. Direct 1RM testing stresses joints and the central nervous system; doing it more often eats into hypertrophy and recovery. Between tests, use rep-max estimation (this calculator) to set training loads. Powerlifters peak for 1RM only 2-4 times per year around meets.
Beyond 10-15 reps, the limit becomes muscular endurance, not strength. The biomechanics of a 1RM lift and a 20-rep set are different - different fiber recruitment, different fatigue mechanisms. The mathematical formulas were fit on 1-10 rep data. Brzycki diverges at 37 reps (division by zero); both formulas should be treated as approximate above 15 reps.
Bench 1.0× BW intermediate, 1.5× advanced; squat 1.5× / 2.25×; deadlift 1.75× / 2.5×. These are NSCA reference values for adult men. Women's standards are roughly 65-75% of male values at the same body weight. The ratio varies more with experience than with body weight, so a year-one lifter at any size will be roughly half of an experienced lifter.
Yes, the formulas apply to squat, bench, deadlift, overhead press, bent-over row, and any compound lift. The rep-to-1RM relationship is similar across exercises, though strength standards differ (typically squat > deadlift > bench > OHP for the same lifter). Isolation lifts (curls, lateral raises) are less reliable because stabilizers fatigue differently.
Use estimated 1RM as the anchor; train mostly with submaximal percentages. Most periodized programs (5/3/1, Texas Method, Smolov) calculate training weights as percentages of estimated 1RM. A typical hypertrophy block runs at 70-80% for sets of 8-12. A strength block runs at 80-90% for sets of 3-6. Testing 1RM is a peaking event, not a training method.
±3-5% for 2-10 rep sets, worse outside that range. Reynolds, Gordon, and Robergs in 2006 (PubMed 16937972) compared Epley and Brzycki against true 1RM in 70 NCAA Division I athletes. Both formulas were accurate enough for routine programming but not precise enough for elite competition prep. For meet preparation, use a true peak attempt.